Something that caught my attention today. From the graph below (click to go to original publisher's website), get this: In jobs common for men, men are paid on average 2 to 3% higher than women. In jobs common for women, men are
still paid higher! Granted women tend to hit a pay ceiling because when they have kids, they are more willing to trade off money for time which subsequently affects performance and remuneration. But what if she does
not have a family? Hmm. I can't really tell if this is true because I don't know how much I would be getting if I was a man. I don't think my boss, who's a man, would tell me in all politically correctness if I should be earning more if I grew a pair :/ but frankly I'm really quite curious to know.
I remember some years ago, an American friend told me that job seekers in the US of A normally do not state their biodata in CVs. That is to remove biasness from potential employers - you should be hiring me for my experience, skills and potential and
not gender, colour and age. I wonder if this holds water in Asia? Because everyone prefers a hot young thing (tell me it isn't so especially in the advertising business?). So the next time your new boss takes you in, don't be too enthusiastic. It could be for all the wrong reasons. But I suppose it's only when you get in, you show them who's the boss ;)
Or to just make it simple. Give everyone a set of Google interview questions. That'd gauge their IQ, EQ and mental agility pretty well. But for heaven's sake, give a fair pay. Inequality is so out of fashion!